The Path of Science
June 15th, 2007Previously, I began discussing the limitations of the five senses in evaluating what reality is and how it works. The perspective of the five senses provides a good starting point because they are universal biological instruments we all possess and they function with an equivalent capacity for the majority of people. Due to the common ground they provide, we are more easily able to exchange, relate to and build upon each other’s experiences.
Even though we all have a common point in our five senses, we do have other faculties which are not necessarily equivalent to each others’ with respect to neither their working nor total capacity. Consequently, we often differ vastly in how we experience, internalize and act upon reality. Even though the lack or shortage of any faculty renders the corresponding aspect of reality inaccessible, the power of curiosity and the passion to know the unknown is too great for some of us. These people not only find ways to compensate for or develop what they lack and gain access to the aspects of reality which were previously hidden from them, but they also leave behind paths which the rest of us can follow to transcend our own shortcomings.
One of these paths is science which studies the unfolding of reality based on a foundation consisting of experiments and theories. On one hand, cumulative experiments lead to new theories which aim to create meaning out of disconnected, raw data and describe the results of the experiments in a concise, elegant way. On the other hand, new theories are formulated based on previous theories and they seek validation through new experiments. The path of science is a purely objective one where there is room only for universally observable phenomena. Everything else is strictly excluded. Although it is simple, this methodology has proven very successful over the years. As discoveries chased one another, science has been progressively able to describe and predict reality with increasing precision while simultaneously revealing the deficiencies of our five senses and our commonsense.
The appeal of the path of science is that it is very easy to relate to without much mental resistance since everything science has discovered and put forth is universally observable by anyone, anywhere, any time as long as the right set of tools to carry out the experiments are available. It is hard to argue against results which are repeatable and personally verifiable. Even though science does not necessarily have all the answers or even all the important questions, it has made significant progress in finding gaps in our understanding of reality and it has plenty of commonsense-defying discoveries that definitely need to be integrated into our mental models.
Despite science’s appeal, the language of science, mathematics, is not very accessible to everyone. Being an abstract language, mathematics provides a universal framework which can easily describe intangible concepts and entities, sidestepping the subjective elements of human languages. However, its abstract nature combined with the difficulty of sensualizing its formulations restrict its use in everyday life. Thus, most of us never spend the effort to get fluent in it. Unfortunately, this sometimes results in misinterpretations which lead the uninformed and unsuspecting travelers of this path away from the objective of mastering reality.
The path of science is honest, insightful and nondiscriminative. Thus, it is an excellent companion on the quest to understanding and mastering reality, but keep in mind that it is only one of many available viewpoints.






RSS feed